PERANCANGAN ANTARMUKA ONLINE COURSE PADA PERANGKAT MOBILE MENGGUNAKAN TEORI USABILITY

Elia Zakharia, Djoko Budiyanto Setyohadi, Y. Sigit Purnomo W. P.

Abstract


E-learning model can be developed into various forms according to the context of development. All of e-learning model aims to support learning process. The main objective of this study was to design online course interface that runs in mobile device using the theory of usability ISO 9241-11 in UAJY (Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta). Data was collected from 55 undergraduate students of UAJY. It is used as initial state in design process. Furthermore, online course interface design created with use case diagram that adapted to activities of HTA. Nevertheless, in the design process components of interface created by the user persona and mobile device pattern, as well as guided by MGQM, which is also adapted to the limitations of this study and the conditions in UAJY. In addition, using log data collection to handle part of MGQM, which related with time, steps, resources.


Keywords


online course interface, mobile device, usability, ISO 9241-11

Full Text:

PDF

References


Annett, J., & Duncan, K. D. (1967). Task analysis and training design. Occupational Psychology, 41, 211–221.

Branon, R., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education. TechTrends, 45(1), 36. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763377

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 4–7). CRC Press.

Caballé, S., Xhafa, F., & Barolli, L. (2010). Using mobile devices to support online collaborative learning. Mobile Information Systems, 6(1), 27–47. http://doi.org/10.3233/MIS-2010-0091

Cheryan, S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kim, S. (2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1825–1835. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004

Chung, K., & Shin, D.-H. (2015). Effect of elastic touchscreen and input devices with different softness on user task performance and subjective satisfaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 83, 12–26. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.06.003

Cooper, A. (1999). The Inmates Are Running the Asylum. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Craven, J., Johnson, F. C., & Butters, G. (2010). The usability and functionality of an online catalogue. Aslib Proceedings. http://doi.org/10.1108/00012531011015217

Diamond, S., & Irwin, B. (2013). Using e-learning for student sustainability literacy: framework and review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(4), 338–348. http://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-09-2011-0060

Friess, E. (2015). Personas in Heuristic Evaluation : An Exploratory Study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(2), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2015.2429971

He, D., Peng, Y., Mao, M., & Wu, D. (2010). Supporting information access in e-learning by integrating digital libraries and ontology. Online Information Review, 34(5), 704–728. http://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011084582

Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information and Management, 45(7), 499–506. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.07.005

ISO 9241-11. (1998). Guidance on Usability. International Organization for Standardization, 1–21.

Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2002). Web-based Cases in Teaching and Learning ? the Quality of Discussions and a Stage of Perspective Taking in Asynchronous Communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10(1), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.1076/ilee.10.1.1.3613

Kantore, A., & Greunen, D. Van. (2010). An evaluation of the usability of an m-learning tool – a case study. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications, (September).

Kim, D., & Kim, D. J. (2012). Effect of screen size on multimedia vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 62–70. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01145.x

Kim, H. J., Pederson, S., & Baldwin, M. (2012). Improving user satisfaction via a case-enhanced e-learning environment. Education + Training, 54(2/3), 204–218. http://doi.org/10.1108/00400911211210305

Kordaki, M., & Daradoumis, T. (2009). Critical Thinking as a Framework for Structuring Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication within Learning Design-Based E-Learning Systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 246, 83–98. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04001-6_6

Kratochvíl, J. (2013). Evaluation of e-learning course, Information Literacy, for medical students. The Electronic Library, 31(1), 55–69. http://doi.org/10.1108/02640471311299137

Kratochvíl, J. (2014). Efficiency of e-learning in an information literacy course for medical students at the Masaryk University. The Electronic Library, 32(3), 322 – 340. http://doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2012-0087

Lerouge, C., Ma, J., Sneha, S., & Tolle, K. (2011). User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(11), e251–e268. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006

Loh, C., Wong, D. H., Quazi, A., & Kingshott, R. P. (2016). Re-examining students’ perception of e-learning: an Australian perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 129–139. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2014-0114

Male, G., & Pattinson, C. (2011). Enhancing the quality of e-learning through mobile technology: A socio-cultural and technology perspective towards quality e-learning applications. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 28(5), 331–344. http://doi.org/10.1108/10650741111181607

Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., & Allan, G. (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software, 3(4), 51–61. http://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.3.4.51-61

Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. A. (2011). Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? Design Studies, 32(5), 417–430. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003

Murphy, E., Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583–591. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x

Neil, T. (2012). Mobile Design Pattern Gallery. (D. Fauxsmith & M. Treseler, Eds.) (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media.

Neil, T. (2014). Mobile Design Pattern Gallery. (K. Ebrahim & M. Treseler, Eds.) (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media.

Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books.

Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. J. (1999). Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(5), 427–440. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008621827601

Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 6(1), 21–40.

Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Sloan, D., Porter, E., Robins, K., & McCourt, K. (2014). Using e-learning to support international students’ dissertation preparation. Education + Training, 56(2), 122–140. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2012-0103

Travis, C., & Murano, P. (2014). A comparative study of the usability of touch-based and mouse-based interaction. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 10(1), 115–134. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJPCC-01-2014-0015

Tsakonas, G., & Papatheodorou, C. (2006). Analysing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services. Journal of Information Science. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506065934

Tsakonas, G., & Papatheodorou, C. (2008). Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 44(3), 1234–1250. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.07.008

Turner, A. M., Reeder, B., & Ramey, J. (2013). Scenarios , personas and user stories : User-centered evidence-based design representations of communicable disease investigations. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(4), 575–584. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.04.006

Vai, M., & Sosulski, K. (2011). Essentials of Online Course Design: A Standards-Based Guide. Routledge.

Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77–90. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1

Wu, W. H., Jim Wu, Y. C., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 59(2), 817–827. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21460/inf.2016.121.468

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share